Options
 
 

Week of October 5, 2003

 


 


JWs teach that the soul is you, all of you, alive or dead. There is no immortal soul for the JW, only an impersonal spirit which animates the body and like electricity is cut off and symbolically returns to God who gave it. So, when dead, there is nothing left of the believer but the memory of him in the mind of Jehovah. So, who is this person raised from the dead? Me? Hardly, I died. It’s a copy made from memory. There is nothing that links the current me to that copy of me at all, just a memory transcribed onto a new body.

Being that Jehovah can do anything, there is actually nothing to stop him from taking his memory of me right now and making a duplicate or as many copies of me as he wishes.... yet if I am alive I will without doubt know that none of them are THIS ME. There is nothing that will make any one of them me if I should die while they are alive...So what would change if they are made after I die? I see nothing at all... so there seems to be no reason to believe that I would be raised from the dead... only a copy of me.


Since none of us alive today has personally experienced a resurrection, we must consider the only reliable account of someone who has; namely, the one called "the firstborn from the dead"—Jesus. The resurrection of Jesus Christ was unique in that after he was brought back from the dead, over the course of several weeks, he manifested himself to his disciples in order to convince them that he was indeed resurrected.

According to the Bible, Jesus was dead for parts of three days and on the third day he came back to life. But was he merely a copy of his previous self? Obviously not, for the simple reason that Jesus was "put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit," as the Bible says.  Jesus was a different kind of creation, but was he a different person? Well, on several occasions when Jesus materialized in the flesh his disciples didn't even recognize him—but Jesus assured them that it was him. Mary once mistook him for a gardener, but when he said her name in a particular way Mary immediately recognized Jesus. Later, Jesus met his disciples on the road and pretended to be an uninformed traveler. But as he spoke and taught the apostles they gradually recognized that they were being taught by their former teacher. So, even though Jesus was in a different form after his resurrection, he retained his personality and mind. If that had not been the case, then, Jesus would have been guilty of fraud for convincing his followers that he was really Jesus when that was not the case.

What is more, if Jehovah merely brought back a duplicate of Christ then God himself would be guilty of an injustice. That's because Jehovah resurrected Christ because Jesus did not deserve to die. By resurrecting his son, Jehovah was undoing the miscarriage of justice that had taken place. But, if the resurrected Jesus was merely a clone of the original, then the real Christ remains dead and the present Jesus is a false Christ.

From a human standpoint, if we think about it, none of us are the same people we were in the past. Think back ten years; twenty years; look at an old childhood photo of yourself. Do you look the same? Do you think and act as you did when you were younger? Probably not. For better or worse, we all gradually change. Scientists say after seven years there is not even so much as one molecule left of our previous self because of the process of cellular regeneration. So, what makes us who we are? It is hard to say exactly. But, we can say that as long as we recognize ourselves and others, and have some continuity with our past by means of a memory, we are the same person. 

Consider the tragic victims of Alzheimer's, for example. In advanced stages of the disease the victims cannot even recognize themselves or their loved ones. Yet, by all accounts they are the same person. But, are they really? Genetically, yes, but since they have no recollection of themselves or their place in the world they literally become lost souls. So, one crucial aspect of who we are is tied up in our memory of our past self.

Ultimately, though, it comes down to trusting God's power and not relying on our own understanding of how the resurrection works. Honestly, we don't have a clue how our own brains work or even what constitutes a thought. It is simply beyond human comprehension that this little blob of wrinkled gray membrane in our skulls can generate thoughts and retain memories. There is no scientific explanation for the phenomenon. The ability to think and reason and recognize ourselves and others is not really a physical thing even though our thoughts are generated by an organic organ.

But surely the Creator knows what a thought is. He must be the Originator of consciousness. He is the universal mind—the only mind really—all others are merely knock-off miniatures. The name Jehovah literally means "He that causes to become." And Jehovah has caused humans to become like himself, in that we are made in his image. One aspect of being made in God's image means that we are sovereign individuals capable of self-awareness. So, how is Jehovah going to reanimate creatures that have long since expired? Again, we have no idea how he animated us in the first place, but, yet, we are aware that we presently exist as individuals. And that is no ordinary thing even though we take life for granted. But, if Jehovah can create life from the inanimate dust and infuse his own mental capabilities into us, it should not be any challenge for him to re-create persons that have already existed and who have left an impression of themselves in Jehovah's own all-knowing and unfathomable mind.


 


What is the difference between the Lord's day, Jehovah's day, the presence of Jesus, and the presence of the day of Jehovah? It seems to me these are all variations of the same thing.


I think so too. And we could add the expressions the time of the end, final part of the days, and the conclusion of the system to that list as well.


 


Do you believe Jehovah encoded the bible, with small very specific words and sentences, in close relationship to each other? It appears to be statistically impossible without divine intervention. Could the Torah codes be something Jehovah used to keep some things secret until the time of the end, when we have sophisticated computers to decode the bible?


The Hebrew text of the Bible was originally written without vowels. The reader supplied the vowels as he read the text. Cracking the so-called Bible code necessarily involves supplying vowels to selected consonants to spell out words. There is a range of possible spellings depending on which vowels the computer inserts. For example, supposedly the Bible code foretold the assassination of the Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Rabin. To come up with that, apparently the computer randomly extracted the three letters "RBN" out of a string of thousands of letters and then added an "A" and an "I" to spell Rabin. But it could also have spelled out "Robin" or "Ruben," depending on which vowels were selected. So, the Bible code could have just as easily been made to refer to Batman's(TM) comic book sidekick—Robin.

All words in the supposed code are arbitrarily put together to form words. That is not how God speaks to us. God appeals to our reason by communicating in a language that we can understand. He doesn't try to mystify us with unintelligible secret codes that foretell unrelated trivia. Instead of a code foretelling unrelated things, all of the prophecies found in the Bible foretell events in relation to some aspect of Christ or his kingdom. The Bible code in fact makes a mockery of prophecy.

Here is an interesting article the Watchtower wrote on the topic.


 


Watchman, has the watchtower accepted the mark of the Beast by its N.G.O. relationship it had with the United Nations?


No. No one has the mark of the beast yet for the simple reason that that particular beast has not begun ruling yet. The mark of the beast has reference to the final judgment that will occur during the tribulation when the present political system suffers a mortal wound but then recovers. Those who obey the beast after its miraculous recovery are judged worthy of everlasting death. See the essay The Last Hour of the 8th King