Are you suggesting that we as Jehovah's Witnesses should stop reading the Watchtower because it is apostate literature? I used to view all literature from the Society as being "inspired" by Jehovah, for lack of a better word. Are you suggesting that Jehovah does not want us reading this literature? Is Jehovah supporting the Watchtower or not? |
Since you used the word "inspired," that should call to our minds the advice of the apostle John, where he said: "Beloved ones, do not believe every inspired expression, but test the inspired expression, to see whether it originates with God, because many false prophets have gone forth into the world." Elsewhere in scripture; namely in Jude and 2nd Peter, we are warned that false teachers will infiltrate Christ's congregation and will lurk among us like submerged rocks below the waterline. It is not so clear-cut that the Christian congregation is either perfect or evil. According to Christ, both the evil slave and the faithful slave work side-by-side in God's house up until the time that the master arrives for judgment. The influence of both slaves is evident in the Watchtower Society today. So, accordingly, no matter how respected the source, each of us have the personal responsibility before God to be diligent students of his Word in order to 'test the inspired expression' as to its authenticity. |
I was just wondering how you explain certain passages in the Bible. Now you believe that Jesus' Resurrection was only in spirit, correct? How then do you explain when Jesus is talking to Thomas in the upper room and he clearly states to Thomas, who was expressing doubt about the resurrection, to touch His hands and put his hand in His side? Then he stated, quite interestingly, that a spirit does not have flesh and bones. Very clearly, this is talking about a bodily resurrection and not a spirit only. Now you may want to say that he merely manifested himself in another body. However you cannot do this for He was recognized by all of the disciples and the nail prints and the spear wound in His side were there. Would this not then credit the bodily resurrection of Christ? |
Nowhere in the Bible does it say that Jesus was resurrected in the flesh. In fact, it says the very opposite; that Jesus was put to death in the flesh and brought to life in the spirit, and that Jesus became a life-giving spirit. That doctrine was discussed in the mailbag a few weeks ago. While Jesus was resurrected as a spirit, for a brief period after his resurrection, in order to fully convince his apostles that he had indeed been raised from the dead, Jesus manifested himself in different human bodies. On one occasion, Jesus even manifested himself with the wounds inflicted from his impalement. When Jesus materialized as a human, he was at that moment—human. The Bible records many occasions when angels crossed over from the spirit realm into the physical realm. And when angels materialize they are no longer spirits. For example, in Abraham's day, three angels materialized and had a meal with Abraham—just as Jesus ate with his apostles after his resurrection. And that's why Jesus said that a spirit does not have flesh and bones: because when Jesus materialized he was no longer a spirit; otherwise he would have been invisible. But, it is interesting in the account in the 24th chapter of Luke, that Jesus suddenly appeared in their midst out of nowhere. In the 20th chapter of John, it adds the detail that Jesus appeared in a room with his disciples even though the doors were locked. That is something that flesh-and-blood humans cannot do. It is apparent, then, that Jesus was a spirit, but that when he materialized flesh he was not a spirit at that point. But, since the Scriptures are clear that flesh and blood cannot inherit God's kingdom, it is evident that when Jesus eventually left this earth and entered heaven, it was as a spirit and not as a man. |
When a person is of the anointed class, does he or she know before they are baptized, or does Jehovah reveal it only after baptism? |
| Typically it is after baptism; sometimes they are chosen long afterwards. However, there are a few that apparently had the heavenly calling before they were baptized. That is not unscriptural since Cornelius and his family received the anointing of the holy spirit before they were baptized. (Acts 10) |
Why is Jehovah used and not Adonai or Elohim? Don't most followers believe that Jehovah is the "rightful name of God?" |
The Watchtower has made available online a wonderful brochure that discusses the importance of God's name. Click here. It is evident that the Devil has waged a long-running campaign to have God's personal name removed from the Bible, or at least de-emphasized, so that the Divine name is hidden from mankind. To that end, the clergy of Christendom and Bible scholars have been more than willing accomplices of that demonic crusade to obscure the importance of the name of Jehovah. Even the notion that YHWH should be pronounced as Yahweh has been shown to be false. Click Here. Since the adoption of the Trinity in the earliest days of Christendom, the obvious intent of the enemies of the truth is to confuse the identity of Jehovah with Christ. In order to accomplish that, the name of Jesus' Father has been shoved into the background, so that most people who consider themselves to be Christians do not attach any special importance to the name. |
Is Jehovah all knowing, in the sense of looking into the future and knowing the choices that all individuals will make during the course of their lives, prior to them actually making those choices? If so, does He exercise that knowledge? And if He does exercise that knowledge does He act on it prior to choices being made? And if so would this not remove the right of an individual to exercise free will? Are there scriptures that shed light on this? |
It is not a question of whether Jehovah has the ability to do such a thing. Jesus once said that with God nothing is impossible. But, the question is whether God chooses to use his power to know in advance certain details. As you note, Jehovah has granted us the right of free will. Take the example of Cain: God specifically warned him of the terrible consequences of the path that he was on. But, did God intervene to prevent Cain from choosing to follow the Devil and become a murderer? No, he didn't. Did God indicate that Cain's course was predestined? Again, the answer is no. God did, however, set before Cain the two possible outcomes based upon the exercise of free will. At Genesis 4:7, Jehovah asked: "If you turn to doing good, will there not be an exaltation? But, if you do not turn to doing good, there is sin crouching at the entrance, and for you is its craving; and will you, for your part, get the mastery over it?" The above verse indicates that God does not intervene to prevent us from making wrong choices. He respects that we are free moral agents, and apparently he is interested in watching to see how we use our free will. The fact that there would be an exaltation, apparently in heaven, in accord with Jesus' own comments about the angels rejoicing over one sinner that repents, indicates that Jehovah and his heavenly family do not choose to know our individual outcomes. Instead, they are cheering us on to make the right decisions. After all, God wants his creatures to love him. Love, by it very nature, must be voluntary and spontaneous—not controlled or contrived in anyway. Of course, though, we also recognize that God does, at times, intervene to countermand and over-ride the will of man in order to ensure that his will is ultimately accomplished—which is his prerogative as God Almighty. But, such occasions are rare. Jesus once stated that Jehovah is so cognizant of his creation that it does not escape his notice when even one lowly sparrow falls to the earth. Even though through prophecy God demonstrates his ability to know the end before the beginning, the very fact that Jehovah watches the goings-on of his vast Creation so closely indicates that he gets great satisfaction out of little surprises—particularly as it relates to those creatures who are made in his image and the choices they make in order to demonstrate their love and affection for their heavenly Father. |
What is the tribulation? When it comes what happens? |
| The tribulation is the final convulsion that comes upon the world as a result of Satan and his demons being evicted from heaven at the birth of Christ's kingdom. While the Watchtower has stated over and over that the tribulation commences when the United Nations suddenly turns upon organized religion in order to destroy it, there are no scriptures that support that particular ordering of events. Instead, Jesus said that the beginning of death pangs upon this wicked system would be in evidence when 'nation arises against nation.' At Matthew 24:29 Jesus said: "Immediately after the tribulation in those days." Apparently, the tribulation Jesus was referring to begins with 'nation rising against nation'—what may eventually be referred to secularly as World War Three. |
Dear E-watchman I have a very confusing question concerning the doctrine of the "rapture" My cousin who is a Born-Again minister is always telling me that JW's are wrong about not believing in a literal rapture. My question is: What do Born-agains believe the rapture is? Do they really believe that one day the Christian church of believers will float up into the sky and go to heaven? I have always been confused about the "rapture". And also the 144,000 could not the number been filled in the first century. Millions of Christians were slaughtered in the Coliseum, eating by lions, burned alive so I think the 144,000 was already filled up in the 1st century what is your views on this? |
The rapture is the belief that Jesus suddenly takes all believers off of the earth—beaming them up, as it were. Hal Lindsey popularized this notion back in the early 70's with his Late Great Planet Earth writings. More recently, the Left Behind series has similarly captivated evangelicals and turned into a pre-Armageddon movement. Appropriately enough, the book series is located in the fiction section. When Paul spoke about anointed Christians meeting Christ in the air, he was not saying that Jesus was going to miraculously levitate his chosen ones bodily into the heavens. That is pure fiction. It comes from the same source that teaches such unbiblical nonsense as the Trinity and that God tortures poor sinners forever in hell, etc. The truth is that all of God's anointed sons and daughters must first die in order to receive their heavenly reward. Paul said that we must die a death like Christ's. There are numerous prophecies, which I am not willing to discuss in depth at this particular time, that indicate that during the tribulation all of the remaining sons of God will be martyred. It is by means of death that they will instantaneously be united with Christ in heaven. Also, the evangelicals teach that the rapture beams up all Christians before the tribulation. However, Jesus indicated that the tribulation would be cut short in order for flesh to survive. Contrary to evangelical fiction, besides the anointed, Jehovah's blessed ones are going to survive the end of the world and they will have the privilege of remaining upon the earth after the smoke clears. As for the millions that you suppose were killed in the Coliseum—that was not the case. For one thing, killing people is hard work. Killing millions of people is a holocaust, and cannot be done easily. Hitler, for instance, devoted the industrial resources of a mighty nation to exterminating peoples and yet with all of his machinery working night and day, he only killed six to ten million over a span of approximately 10 years. Having said that, apparently hundreds of thousands were killed in the Roman Coliseum, but most of them were not Christians. Besides that, the coliseum in Rome was not built until 80 CE. That was toward the so-called "last hour" of the apostolic era, when the anointing was winding down. Although Paul spoke about fighting wild beasts in Ephesus, evidently that arena did not slaughter Christians on the scale as Rome did afterwards. Furthermore, Paul cited the prophetic account of Elijah, where the prophet was assured that he was not alone—that Jehovah had let remain 7,000 who had not bent their knee to Baal. At Romans 11:5, Paul applied that account to the 1st century, saying: "In this way, therefore, at the present season also a remnant has turned up according to a choosing due to undeserved kindness." In order for the comparison to have any significance, the number of Christians at that "present season" in the first century had to be comparable to the 7,000 figure Paul cited in prophecy. That is nowhere near the millions that some suppose. Interestingly, in this 'present season,' today, there are also a comparable number of professed anointed ones. |
I stumbled across this site, where I learned about the scandals in the Watchtower Society, particularly the NGO membership. Now I am devastated, but I am afraid to ask anyone about this, for obvious reasons. Do JW's know about this? What would happen if I asked my elders about this or wrote to the society wanting an explanation? I don’t doubt that this is the truth, but now I am just so confused about my feelings for the organization. Why have I never heard about this NGO thing before? If this is Jehovah's organization, why would he allow that to happen? Why haven’t the leaders of the Watchtower been punished? I just don’t understand. Where is the justice? Haven't sincere JW's questioned them? Do they even know? I really want to confront my elders and write to the society but I am afraid of what will happen. Do you have any advice? |
Most of Jehovah's Witnesses do not know of the NGO scandal. If you were to ask your local elders they may not even know what you are talking about. If you write to the Watchtower they will likely tell you that the NGO membership was so that they could merely gain access to the UN library and nothing more. The purpose of e-Watchman discussing the matter in the first place is to draw attention to Jehovah's judicial decisions regarding his people. Jehovah's Witnesses should not be so naïve so as to imagine that even some of those who were originally anointed by God cannot become apostate and act as a corrupting influence within the organization. If even Christ's own apostle, Judas, could go undetected up until he betrayed the Son of God, why do we suppose that no such creatures ought to roam among us presently? It is all the more reason for us to wait on Christ in anticipation of his bringing such matters to light and the eventual punishment he is destined to mete out upon the wicked slave in our midst. |
I have been a Witness for 42 years, but the stand now taken by the [Watchtower] Society regarding use of certain blood fractions confuses me. Does the Society now approve of the collection of blood from donors so we can use the bits our conscience permits? How does the society get around the fact that Jehovah commanded the blood should be poured out onto the ground in the form it came out of the animal, no way was it to be stored in a vessel to be later poured onto the ground. I really think the new reasoning is wrong, how do I cope with this? |
The answer to your question is that your conscience does not permit you to use derivatives of blood products. That is the point: It is a conscience matter. If you feel that using any sort of blood product violates God's law, then you should not use it, as that would be a sin for you. Paul discussed this aspect of how each Christian's conscience may differ on certain issues and that we should not judge each other on the basis of how each one's conscience operates. It is not so much that the Watchtower has changed its teaching on abstaining from blood. The reality is that the medical use of blood has gradually changed over the years. Originally, blood transfusions were pretty straightforward—there was either whole red blood or plasma in a plastic bag with a tube and a needle inserted into the recipient's arm. There was no ambiguity about it. Now, though, blood is broken down into numerous constituent parts and micro-fractions of the original substance and these various components are used in all sorts of pharmaceuticals and other treatments. The question, though, is whether the use of blood derivatives amounts to using blood itself. At what point are the micro-fractions of blood so far removed from the whole that they are not really recognizable as blood? Those are very complicated legalistic questions for which there is no right answer because God has not told us exactly how he thinks on the issue. Hence, the Watchtower has wisely left it up to each Christian to decide for themselves. It is similar to the Sabbath issue that the Jews and Christians had to grapple with. The Bible forbade all work on the Sabbath under pain of death. However, questions naturally arose as to what exactly constituted "work." There were exceptions. For example, the Bible made allowance for a Sabbath day's journey, so that while traveling long distances was considered a violation, traveling a short distance was considered a reasonable allowance. A Sabbath day's journey was a little over one-half mile. But, then, some are going to push the issue and want to define exactly how many inches a Sabbath day's journey should be. The Pharisees legislated thousands of Sabbath laws to 'clarify' God's law. Many of their regulations were absurd. For example, swatting a fly might be interpreted as a violation of the injunction against working on the Sabbath. Thankfully the leadership of the Watchtower has so far successfully avoided falling into the pharisaic tar pits on the issue of forbidding the use of every molecule that derives from blood. They have instead placed the responsibility where it ultimately belongs—on each one of Jehovah's Witnesses—in order that each of us may determine what is right and what is wrong for ourselves in the sight of God. |
Matthew 24:31 says "And he will send forth his angels with a great TRUMPET sound, and they will gather his chosen ones together from the four winds, from one extremity of the heavens to the other". 1 Cor. 15:52 says "...in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, during the last TRUMPET. For the TRUMPET will sound, and the dead will be raised up incorruptible, and we shall be changed". These verses, which both refer to the Lord returning with the accompanying sound of a trumpet, seem to link the same event, i.e., the heavenly resurrection of the anointed. As the above-quoted scripture in Matt 24 is obviously yet to be fulfilled, then surely the resurrection of those dead ones of the heavenly calling has not yet happened, as is taught by the Society, and is yet to occur. Do you agree? |
| Yes, I agree that the first resurrection has not begun yet, but that it is likely to begin shortly. |