Options
 
 

Week of February 23, 2003

 


 


The WT claims Jesus was resurrected as a spirit. This is in direct contradiction to 1 John 4:2: "By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit which confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God." Can you elaborate on this?


The coming of Christ in the flesh was not in connection with his resurrection and ascension back to heaven. Christ came in the flesh when he was born as a human Son of God. He also came in the flesh when he came to John the Baptist to be baptized and was born again as a spirit begotten Son of God. That's what Christians must confess, that the man Jesus Christ was Jehovah's promised Messiah when he came down to the earth.


 


This generation, that sees these things take place, (1914) will not pass away. Is this the generation that was born in 1914 or were alive and old enough to witness these things?


No. The reason being is that the generation of 1914 is virtually gone. Here is a link to an article on the 80th anniversary of the signing of the Armistice in 1918. It gives you some idea of how few men there are left in the world today that were alive back then. With each passing year, it becomes more and more evident that 1914 did not mark the beginning of Jesus' presence, and so that's why that generation is gone. Up until 1994, Jehovah's Witnesses had speculated as to the length of a generation. It was generally assumed that because Moses stated that the days of our years only amounted to 70 or 80 years, it then seemed reasonable that the generation of 1914 would not exceed 80 years. But, as that 80th year came and went it became evident that something was just not right in our understanding of Jesus' prophecy regarding the generation that would not pass away until the kingdom came.

Back in the November 1, 1995, issue of the Watchtower, right after the passing of the 80th year, an article redefined what a "generation" was according to the way Christ supposedly used the word. The Watchtower basically removed the element of time connected to the length of a generation, and thus they rendered Christ's words more-or-less meaningless as far as marking off any sort of measurable timeframe. But, instead of redefining what Jesus meant by a "generation," eventually we will probably have to reconsider when it is that Christ's presence actually begins.


 


In Genesis 6:4, the Bible verse reads: "The Nephilim proved to be in the Earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of the [true] God continued to have relations with the daughters of men and they bore sons to them, they were the mighty ones who were of old, the men of fame." My question is if the Nephilim were destroyed by the flood why does the verse say they were in the Earth after Noah's time? Also, chapter 6, verse 1, talks about the angels taking human wives and verse 4 says they continued to have human wives. Did the angels have relations with human women more than once? Is this why there were giants in King Saul's time?


That is a rather difficult verse to understand. But, the way the verse should be understood is that the sons of God continued to have relations with women, not after the flood, but after the Nephilim first appeared. In other words, the pre-flood world was evidently being repopulated with more than just a few of the sons of the rebel angels. It was as if an entirely new race of creatures was taking over the planet, as the sons of God continued to father their freakish offspring--even after it was manifest what kind of evil creatures they were. Remember, the reason that Jehovah caused such a tremendous cataclysm in the first place was not just to destroy an evil world, but the flood flushed out the wicked sons of God and forced the materialized angels to abandon their fleshly bodies and return to the spirit realm where they belonged. After the rebellious sons of God dematerialized, Jehovah slapped the cuffs on them, so-to-speak, in that the Scriptures speak of the demons being put under restraint—evidently preventing them from re-materializing to carry on as before.

As regards the Nephilim after the flood, Numbers 13:33 indicates that when the Hebrew spies went into the Promised Land, they encountered giants, whom were also called Nephilim. However, the verse indicates that the post-flood Nephilim were the sons of Anak—making them human, and not demigods. Evidently, then, there was a race of unusually large men, Goliath among them, that inhabited the land of Canaan up until the time of Saul and David. They were also called Nephilim, but they were not sons of the rebellious angels.


 


What are the basic beliefs and practices of the Jehovah Witness faith?


The Watchtower has a brochure available from their website that should answer your questions.

 


In your question & answer section you made a comment regarding the expression "the last days". In referring to the passage at Acts 2:17 you stated: "So, according to the apostle Peter, the pouring out of God's spirit marked the beginning of the last days for the Jewish system." I read Acts and in the account of Pentecost and I didn't see that Peter said that the pouring out of God's spirit marked the beginning of "the last days of the Jewish system". I saw that he only used the expression "the last days." How can you demonstrate scripturally show that Peter was in fact referring to the last days of the Jewish System, as opposed to simply the "last days?"


A few weeks before Pentecost, Jesus gave an extensive two-fold prophecy that foretold the destruction of Jerusalem and also the entire system. As part of that prophecy, Jesus gave his disciples specific instructions on how to respond once it became apparent to them the holy place in Jerusalem had been violated by a "disgusting thing."  Jesus plainly told them that in connection with God's temple, a stone would not be left upon a stone. 

According to the prophecy in the 2nd chapter of Joel that Peter quoted on Pentecost, there would be visible miraculous phenomenon as a precursor to Jehovah's day of vengeance. For example, there would be blood, fire, and smoke mist, and the sun would be darkened. While the prophecy of Joel primarily applies to the end of the world, it is interesting that just 50 days prior to Pentecost, the inhabitants of Jerusalem experienced the eerie foreboding darkness that befell Jerusalem at high noon when Christ's blood was poured out—the sun was quite literally darkened as Joel foretold.

Also, at that same time, there was a violent earthquake and there were heard strange reports that corpses had been seen unearthed from their tombs. It was, then, after the momentous events surrounding Jesus' death and resurrection, that the spirit was poured out upon Jehovah's sons and daughters as Joel had also foretold. It was at that point that the apostles began preaching Jehovah's judgment upon that generation of Jews. When the Jews asked Peter what they should do to escape Divine retribution for having put God's Son to death, Peter responded in the 40th verse by saying: "Get saved from this crooked generation." And, that generation did indeed meet up with the execution of Jehovah's judgments, and only those who heeded Jesus' warning and left the doomed city when the sign appeared, were saved.


 


I have read many of these questions, and some appear to be from Jehovah Witnesses themselves having doubts about a belief either on blood transfusions, disfellowshipping, etc. I, too, question some beliefs. Why have disfellowshipping? When someone does something wrong, they should be helped, encouraged to do right, NOT have everyone turn their backs on them and kick them out. Getting disfellowshipped just makes you lonely and start not believing, I know many JWs that have gone through this and many have stopped going to the meetings entirely. So why not extend your arms to a wrong doer and HELP them instead of closing the door?


First, it must be pointed out that the vast majority are disfellowshipped for sexual immorality and not for questioning some belief. Also, no one is automatically disfellowshipped for anything. Many who commit serious moral offenses are merely reproved and exhorted to 'go and sin no more.' Granted, the act of being disfellowshipped is a harsh measure: Paul likened it to handing an individual over to Satan in order for them to be disciplined by the hard experience. Because of its severity, disfellowshipping can either make or break the person—depending on how they individually respond to the discipline.

In the case of those who develop doubts, Jude exhorts the overseers to "continue showing mercy to some that have doubts; save them by snatching them out of the fire."  That is probably an area where elders fall short. That's because there is very little tolerance for questioning Watchtower teachings and policies. The attitude that has developed over the years is that it is either 'the Society's way—or the highway.' Because the Watchtower has never made any provision for brothers to discuss such things, elders are ill-equipped to deal with specific issues related to points of contention and doubt. So, unfortunately, some are not snatched out of the fires of doubt as they might have been, had the organization been more open and honest about its shortcomings.

On a positive note, those who are disfellowshipped, or otherwise alienated from the congregation, can take comfort and courage that Jehovah is not bound by the rulings of human tribunals. A disfellowshipped person may, in fact, demonstrate more faith in Jehovah through their own personal struggle than the many 'faithful' ones who simply go with the program. So, if that is your situation: never give up faith and hope.

At Isaiah 58: 9b Jehovah reasons with his chastened organization. He tells them that if they want his blessing that they have to do something first. The verse reads: "If you will remove from your midst the yoke bar, the poking out of the finger and the speaking of what is hurtful...your light will certainly flash up even in the darkness."

'The poking out of the finger' evidently has to do with pointing an accusing finger and harshly judging each other. At some point that is all going to stop. That's not what spiritual paradise is all about. e-Watchman is pleased to call attention to the many prophecies that foretell of Jehovah's coming judgment that will bring an end to the hurtfulness in Jehovah's organization today.


 


In John 2:19 through 21, Jesus speaks of His body being raised from the dead. He doesn't say that His body disappeared, or was turned into gas; He said that his body would be raised from the dead after three days. In verse 22, the disciples remembered Jesus saying this and believed the word that Jesus said. The disciples witnessed specifically to this very fact throughout the book of Acts, and Paul says (1st Cor. 15) that if you don't believe this then your faith is worthless, you are still in your sins, and you are false witnesses. Why don't Jehovah Witnesses believe like the Jesus wants you to believe?


Jehovah's Witnesses believe and teach the truth on this matter. A few weeks ago, two questions concerning the bodily resurrection of Jesus were addressed, so there is no point in going over the same ground again. Click here and here to link to the mailbag with those questions.

Admittedly, though, this is not an easy question to resolve, but the student must be determined not accept simplistic answers that ignore basic doctrinal truths. Ironically, the 15th chapter of Corinthians, which you cited, disproves the notion that you've embraced about Jesus being raised up a physical man. Paul addressed the very question that you raised regarding what kind of body Jesus had. Here is that span of verses from the NIV Bible linked to in your question above.

But someone will ask, 'How are the dead raised? With what kind of body do they come?' 36Fool! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. 37And as for what you sow, you do not sow the body that is to be, but a bare seed, perhaps of wheat or of some other grain. 38But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. 39Not all flesh is alike, but there is one flesh for human beings, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish. 40There are both heavenly bodies and earthly bodies, but the glory of the heavenly is one thing, and that of the earthly is another. 41There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; indeed, star differs from star in glory. 42So it is with the resurrection of the dead. What is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable. It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. 44It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual body. 45Thus it is written, 'The first man, Adam, became a living being'; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit.

The very last phrase says very simply that Christ "became a life-giving spirit." Paul's illustration of the seed is the perfect analogy. Does a tree or plant bear any resemblance to the seed that bore it? No, in fact the seed must die in order for the tree to come into existence. So it is that, Christ, and the 144,000 born-again sons of the kingdom, must die in the flesh in order to be re-created as immortal spirit creatures in heaven.

But, why did Jesus appear as a human after his resurrection, you ask? First, it must be appreciated that Jesus did not appear as himself after he arose from the dead. For instance, on one occasion Mary mistook him for a gardener. On another occasion, Jesus appeared to his disciples walking on the road and they mistook him for some stranger. In the last chapter of John, the resurrected Jesus appeared to them on the beach in still another human body. True, on one occasion, Jesus manifested himself with the wounds of his impalement, but that evidently was just on that one occasion, in order to convince the disbelieving Thomas.

The fact that it was so difficult for the apostles to grasp the reality of Christ's resurrection is why it was necessary for Christ to manifest himself as a human on various occasions. On the night when Jesus walked on water, the disciples were terrified that they were seeing some sort of apparition. For that reason, we should not expect that the resurrected spirit, Jesus, would appear to his disciples in another form except one that they were comfortable and familiar with. Recall, too, that years later, Jesus did appear to Paul as an invisible spirit, and poor Paul (Saul, at the time) was simply blinded and awestruck by the supernatural encounter.

Since it was so difficult for the apostles to comprehend Jesus' resurrection--even when they knew it was Jesus by what he said and did-- it would have been impossible for them to believe that Jesus had been resurrected into the spirit realm, unless they had seen him with their own eyes as he ascended into the heavens. And, since spirits are invisible to human eyes, the only way that Jesus could make sure his apostles 'got it' is if he materialized a human body, as angels can do.

Remember, please, that up until the moment of Jesus ascension, the apostles were still laboring under the notion that Jesus' kingdom was going to rule from literal Jerusalem. In fact, just moments before his ascension they asked him if he was restoring the kingdom to Israel at that time. The concept of a heavenly kingdom was foreign to them. So, that's why it was necessary for Christ to convince them of his resurrection, then, he made sure that they finally perceived what he had been talking about all along the many times he spoke about his heavenly kingdom and returning to his Father. Once Jesus was lifted up out of view of the disciples, Jesus, no doubt, then dematerialized his flesh and went into the presence of the Great Spirit himself—Jehovah God. That is why the apostle later wrote, to paraphrase: 'If we have known Christ according to the flesh, certainly we know him so no longer.'


 


What are Jehovah's Witnesses views on abortion and why is it that you believe that is the right view? Please could you include Bible verses?


There are no scriptures that speak directly about abortion, probably because such practices were not common in Bible times in the first place. But, there are principles that can be applied to such. For example, in the Law of Moses, at Exodus 21:22-25, Jehovah handed down his judicial ruling concerning what should be done in the case where a pregnant women is injured during a fight between two men, resulting in a miscarriage. (See footnote on NIV link above) The law stated that the offender had to give his life in exchange for the unborn child. The Bible has no instance where that law was ever actually applied in practice, but it does establish a principle that shows God's view of the unborn. If a man even accidentally caused the death of an unborn child, that man had to die in order to satisfy God's justice of 'a soul for soul,': that indicates that God considered the unborn child a soul of equal value to an adult.

According to Christian law and principles, we are to love our neighbor as ourselves. When Jesus gave his famous parable of the so-called "Good Samaritan," the point impressed upon the listener is that anyone in need, or in a helpless condition, is our neighbor and we are obligated by the law of love to show mercy when we can.

Of course, there are often tragic circumstances involved with some pregnancies; but, for the most part, abortion is simply used as a means of birth control. Still, when we consider that virtually everyone alive is glad that they were not aborted, expectant mothers, when faced with the temptation to abort, ought to consider extending mercy to the helpless unborn. Doing so would be following Jesus' law to love our neighbor as ourselves.